Infinite behavior means blank behavior.
The blank slate was a bad metaphor from long ago. Why we need to
defend it or kill it I do not know. But I do so all the same.
Our behavior is infinite. Our selves, a given set of genes, are capable of endless
behavioral repertoires. We could be an infinite many selves. Ones
that vary in behavioral dispositions and identity characteristics in
infinite ways. That is, the things that we think are integral to our
self today are capable of being infinitely manipulated, and yet still have
remaining a robust, viable individual (though perhaps one that our
present selves would disapprove of).
I am tempted to say that is enough to make us blank slates. A slate
is not blank because I can do anything to it. If all I have is yellow
chalk, all I can do is write in yellow, though I can write the word
“blue.” Anyways, enough of that.
What we care about are intricate characteristics of our selves. We
care about behaviors and why we do the things we do, and whether
those things could be done radically differently. Games show that
behavior is infinite, and that is because we can create infinite
numbers of games that our brain/body can play, and this will lead to
infinite behaviors. Now, there is limitations to our behaviors. We
cannot fly unaided (in a gravity world) or calculate as fast as
computers, and thus our game behaviors are limited by such things.
But that also shows by careful manipulation of our environment, say
by creating zero-gravity chambers or living on the moon, we can
create a significantly different game than the one we create on earth
or before the scientific revolution.
Just because there are certain parameters to behavior and behavioral
expression, it does not mean that behavioral expression is not
infinite. Integers have significant parameters to them, but yet we
still declare, intuitively, that they are infinite.
Language and games show the infinite behavioral manipulation that can
be made to any body/brain, to any individual. The language and
society one grows up in will mean that one's language and
game-behavior will be determined by that culture. But of course, it
is completely blank what the games are within the culture that your
genes happened to have been born into. It is therefore blank as to
what game behavior you will end up having.
I, of course, only care a little about game behavior, even if it is
infinite (and hence blank). We care more about other personal
characteristics such as knowledge-gathered and knowledge-used
(intelligence). We care about things like the scope of our
relationships and how we interact with people. But these latter
things are capable, once we put all social institutions and social
discourses on the table, of being infinitely arranged as well. And
given that our genes are capable of being born into many disparate
societal arrangements, the selves we end up being are capable of
being infinitely altered, and in the most dramatic of ways. Hence, I would argue that for most people, such an argument is enough to make us blank slates.
Lastly, the common claims of evolutionary psychology often have to do
with personality traits. I am a strong evolutionist, and I believe
evolution can tell us important things about structures of our
dispositions, but still, with enough societal jingling, much that we
already do through processes of socialization, we can thoroughly
undermine or rewrite or socialize out any kind of personality trait.
We can change institutional and discursive structures that make
genetic structuring of those dispositions vanish in the air,
essentially because the social structures that such genetic
structuring are reacting under has been dissolved.
Often, as we dig deep, the proposed genetic structures that align
with proposed characteristics within our society may be real. As we
tinker with different possible social arrangements, those genetic
structures may have robust effects on the behaviors of individuals. I
would caution, though, that many of these genetic effects that we see happen
in radically altered environments will not fall within the broad
categories that we use to describe such genetically induced characteristics within our
social sphere.
I will lay more of this out in future posts. I will argue that within our present cultural structures, we already significantly alter dispositions through social structure and socialization processes. I also will argue that even with modest social shifts, we can thoroughly alter the meaning and expression of a behavioral disposition, such as the expression of introversion/extroversion.
- For some parallel arguments, check out Jesse Prinz's Beyond Human Nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment